Joe Dog Software
Proudly serving the Internets since 1999
Individuals detained at the ICE Broadview Detention Center have filed a class-action lawsuit alleging abusive treatment and inhumane conditions, including overcrowding and denial of basic necessities. The day after this lawsuit was filed, the government informed a federal court that nearly two weeks' worth of surveillance video footage from inside the facility —covering the timeframe when the alleged abuse occurred — was lost due to a "system crash" on October 31, 2025, just one day after the complaint was filed on October 30.
Government attorneys stated in court that the footage is "irretrievably destroyed," and when questioned, suggested they lack the resources to retain all surveillance video from all cameras indefinitely. Plaintiffs' lawyers find the timing and circumstances highly concerning and are worried about the preservation of evidence. In their filings, the government has offered to produce limited video from earlier and later periods; however, the specific interval from approximately October 20 to October 30, right before the lawsuit, is reported as unrecoverable.
The term "system crash" alone cannot explain 2 weeks of data loss. Something more must be true about the storage architecture, retention logic, or post-crash handling. The technical aspects of the claim and its implications warrant further examination. Let's consider some of the possibilities.
Disk-based Ring Buffering
Most detention-center surveillance systems utilize disk-based ring buffering. Video is constantly written to disk, but storage is finite. Old footage is automatically overwritten after a certain number of days. If the system went down and then came back online without a litigation hold being applied, old footage may have been overwritten.
However, in this case, the data wasn't lost due to a system crash—it was lost due to incompetence or malice. A judge is likely to face the defendant and question, "You knew, or should have known, that this data was relevant—all while allowing your system to destroy it." This situation will be treated as spoliation of evidence.
A Corrupted Disk Array
After a crash, a disk array may enter a degraded or inconsistent state. System administrators can repair the array by rebuilding, fixing, or reinitializing it. Before these operations begin, the video data should still be retrievable. A good forensic team can recover all or most of the data. But the methods used to rebuild it may, or, depending on the recovery method, will result in the loss of metadata, orphaning the video files, or complete erasure. In this instance, human decisions made after the crash contributed to the loss. The admin team chose to rewrite the array despite a litigation hold on all potential evidence. This will not go well in court.
Corrupted Indexes
Video systems rely heavily on indexes that include timestamps, camera IDs, and motion flags. If the index becomes corrupted, the system may struggle to reconcile file blocks. Cleanup jobs could run, leading the software to mark the footage as unusable and delete it to free up storage space. However, there are options for backing up indexes independently. If this were not done, it would indicate another failure on the part of the system administrators. Therefore, the data was not lost due to a mere "system crash." The court will likely interpret this as negligent spoliation.
Cloud Vendor Managed Systems
Some ICE facilities also use vendor-managed Video Management Systems (VMS). In these setups, retention windows are enforced on the server side. If footage isn't explicitly "flagged" or exported, it is automatically deleted according to a schedule. However, if the litigation hold did not reach the vendor in time, the deletion of footage would be foreseeable and preventable.
In every scenario described above, the loss of data stemmed not from a "system crash." From a legal standpoint, this distinction does not benefit the defendants. Courts will consider the following questions:
Every explanation provided falls short on at least one of these tests.